Social Safety Net, Ivanka Trump's Role; Hidden Figures

HELLO, I'M BONNIE ERBE.

WELCOME TO TO THE CONTRARY, A DISCUSSION OF NEWS AND SOCIAL TRENDS FROM DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES.

UP FIRST, THE SOCIAL SAFETY NET.

ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL PRESIDENT TRUMP PROMISED TO PROTECT FEDERAL PROGRAMS THAT ELDERLY AND LOW INCOME AMERICANS RELY ON, SUCH AS SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICAID.

WE'LL KNOW IF HE KEEPS THAT PROMISE WHEN HE GOES BEFORE A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DELIVERING HIS STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS NEXT WEEK.

TRUMP'S WHITE HOUSE BUDGET DIRECTOR CALLS SOCIAL SECURITY A "PONZI SCHEME" AND DROVE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWNS AIMED AT CUTTING SPENDING DURING THE OBAMA YEARS.

BEN CARSON, THE NEW HUD SECRETARY HAS SAID FREQUENTLY, PROGRAMS FOR THE POOR LEAD TO DEPENDENCY.

TOM PRICE, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SUPPORTED TURNING MEDICAID OVER TO THE STATES AND MAKING MEDICARE A VOUCHER-LIKE PROGRAM WHEN HE WAS IN CONGRESS.

CONCERNS ABOUT THE FUTURE OF HEALTHCARE AND MANY OTHER GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS HAVE PROMPTED ANGRY AND FRUSTRATED AMERICANS TO PACK GOP TOWN HALL MEETINGS ACROSS THE COUNTRY DEMANDING ANSWERS.

>> HILLARY WHAT CAN AMERICANS SUSPECT FROM TRUMP WHEN IT COMES TO THE SOCIAL SAFETY NET.

>> IT WILL DEPEND MORE ON CONGRESS THAN PRESIDENT TRUMP HE HAS NOT SAID MUCH ON PROGRAMS FOR LOW INCOME PEOPLE.

BUT I THINK TUESDAY NIGHT'S ADDRESS IS GOING TO ILLUMINATE A LOT ABOUT WHAT HE GIVES CONGRESS TO DO.

>> THE SAFETY NET WILL BE STRONGER AND BIGGER AND HUGE.

>> OK.

I EXPECT IT TO DISAPPEAR.

I THINK BANNON SAID THAT THEY ARE ABOUT DECONSTRUCTING THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATES.

I WOULD BE WORRIED.

>> I DO NOT THINK IT WILL DISAPPEAR BUT I THINK WE WILL SEE A CHIPPING AWAY HE THINKS WE NEED TO LIMIT THE POWER OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

>> SPECIFICALLY WHERE DO -- WE HAVE BEEN TOLD THAT PLANNED PARENTHOOD IS OUT OF THE BUDGET.

IF IT MAKES IT THROUGH THE SENATE LIKE THAT.

BUT WHERE SPECIFICALLY DO YOU -- WHERE DO YOU EXPECT TO SEE INCREASES AND WHERE DO YOU EXPECT TO SEE CUTS?

>> WE HAVE SEEN A FEW THINGS SO FAR THAT ARE TELLING.

HIS FIRST EXECUTIVE ORDER TOOK MONEY AWAY FROM INDIVIDUAL MIDDLE CLASS HOMEOWNERS AND GAVE IT TO THE BANKS IN TERMS OF A MORTGAGE REBATE.

WE HAVE SEEN REGULATIONS GIVING MORE MONEY TO CORPORATIONS I AM A PRO BUSINESS DEMOCRAT AND I DO WANT TO SEE BUSINESS DO WELL AND GROW JOBS.

BUT I THINK TO THE EXTENT THAT EVERYTHING IS FOCUSED ON CORPORATE PROFITS AND NOT THE SAFETY NET NOT THINGS LIKE HEALTHCARE NOT THINGS LIKE MEDICARE AND MEDICAID WHICH REALLY PROVIDES SUCH BASIC PROTECTIONS, IT'S REALLY GOING TO BE TROUBLING IF THAT IS THE ONLY DIRECTION WE SEE THE COUNTRY GOING.

>> I SPOKE TO THE PEOPLE BEACH-HEADED AT THE AGENCIES DEALING WITH THE SOCIAL NET THIS MORNING AND THEY SAID THE PRESIDENT IS FIRMLY COMMITTED NO MATTER WHAT THEY ARE SAYING FIRMLY COMMITTED TO KEEPING MEDICARE AND MEDICAID IN TACK STRENGTHENING THEM.

>> NOW, THAT YOU MENTIONED THAT, HE SAID ONE THING AND HE SAYS HE IS GOING TO GO IN ONE DIRECTION AND THEN THE BUDGET DIRECTOR -- ALWAYS ROLL IT BACK.

LOOK AT TILLERSON ON RUSSIA.

AND -- >> ON THIS HE SAID AND SAYS AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN HE FEELS PEOPLE PAID INTO IT EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE NOT FUNDED THE RETIREMENT BUT IT IS A CONTRACT HE INTENDS TO KEEP.

>> THE TRANSITION TEAMS AND THE AGENCIES HAVE 10% CUTS THAT HAVE BEEN PUT IN PLACE TO GO THROUGH THE SYSTEM ALREADY.

BUT MEDICARE AND MEDICAID AND SOCIAL SECURITY ARE NOT ON THE LIST AND THEY WANTED ME TO EMPHASIZE THEY ARE NOT ON THAT LIST.

>> WHAT ABOUT WELFARE?

>> WELFARE IS GOING TO BE DESTRUCTED IT WILL BE CHANGED BECAUSE WHAT WE HAVE NOW IS A SYSTEM THAT TRAPS PEOPLE INTO DEPENDENCY.

YOU HAVE FIVE GENERATIONS OF PEOPLE THAT ARE STUCK IN THE SYSTEM THAT IS NOT WHAT IT WAS INTENDED FOR AND IT DESTROYS THE FAMILIES.

>> THERE IS LITTLE WELFARE.

THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT GET WELFARE TODAY ARE POOR WOMEN WITH CHILDREN.

THERE'S NO SORT OF WORK SUBSTITUTE PROGRAM.

BILL CLINTON ELIMINATED THAT.

FOOD STAMPS IS A SIGNIFICANT PIECE OF THE SOCIAL SAFETY NET AND THAT, I THINK, WE WILL SEE CUTS IN WHICH IS TROUBLING.

I WOULD SEPARATE SOCIAL SECURITY FROM THE HEALTHCARE PROGRAMS BECAUSE HE MAY LEAVE SOCIAL SECURITY ALONE BUT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT MEDICAID CUTS AS PART OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT REPEAL AND THAT IS THE SOCIAL SAFETY NET.

>> LET'S GET ON THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT PUSHING RAISING THE AGE FOR QUALIFYING FOR SOCIAL SECURITY WHICH IS A CUT SO WHERE DO YOU SEE THE BIGGEST CUTS COMING?

>> I'M WORRIED BECAUSE IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW WHAT TRUMP IS THINKING BECAUSE AS YOU SAID HE SAYS ONE THING AND THE AIDES ARE ROLLING BACK.

TILLERSON WAS IN MEXICO BEING LIKE DO NOT WORRY ABOUT THIS.

>> AND BANNON AT THE C PACK CONVENTION.

HE PUSHES IT FORWARD AS OPPOSED TO ROLLING IT BACK.

>> APPARENTLY HIS MEDICAID APPOINTEE DOES NOT BELIEVE MATERNITY LEAVE TO BE OPTIONAL AND BECAUSE THERE'S SO MANY WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN THE PROGRAMS, I DO NOT THINK IT IS A PRIORITY FOR DONALD TRUMP.

>> I THINK HE WILL CUT EDUCATION AND THE ARTS THAT TROUBLES ME.

I GREW UP IN A RURAL STATE WHERE I NEED THINGS REICH NPR THERE WAS NOT MUCH ELSE.

I SEE THEM PICKING AND CHOOSING IT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE TO THE POINT OF SOCIAL SECURITY I DO NOT THINK THAT IS SOMETHING THAT HE IS GOING TO REALLY.

HE DOES THAT HE IS DOING SOMETHING TO THE BASE THAT WILL BE TROUBLESOME IN THE YEARS TO COME BUT CUTTING IS A BIG DEAL HERE.

HE IS GOING TO CUT AND SNIP AND IT WILL BE FROM PROGRAMS THAT ARE ESSENTIAL.

>> THERE IS A BILLINGER PICTURE THAT IS IMPORTANT.

WHICH IS THAT HE IS DESPITE HIS YOU KNOW, TRUMPETING HIS OWN POSITION HE IS NOT IN TOTAL CONTROL.

THE CONGRESS HAS A SIGNIFICANT ROLE AND THERE ARE THE CONSERVATIVES HAVE A MAJORITY IN CONGRESS AND THEY HAVE HAD PROGRAMS FOR THE POOR AND FOR WORKING CLASS IN THEIR SIGHTS FOR YEARS.

AND THERE WILL BE A SIGNIFICANT PUSHBACK TO ANYTHING THE PRESIDENT TRIES TO DO AND IN FACT HE APPOINTED ONE OF THE MOST CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS TO BE HIS BUDGET DIRECTOR.

I DO THINK THAT WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TOO MANY FRONTS TO TRY AND SAVE AT THE SAME TIME AND WE ARE NOT GOING TO BE SUCCESSFUL AND PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE HURT.

>> WITH THE 47-SEAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE 47 SEATS BEHIND IN THE HOUSE AND TWO BEHIND IN THE SENATE.

SO WITH THOSE MINORITIES HOW POWERFUL ARE THEY?

>> PLANNED PARENTHOOD PICK EDUCATION SUBSIDIES ANY NUMBER OF ISSUES WE ARE NOT GOING TO SAVE EVERYTHING.

PEOPLE WILL BE HURT.

>> I THINK THAT IS AGAIN, GROSS OVERSTATEMENT.

HE SEES ALSO THE REAL -- >> BUT -- >> CAN I FINISH?

>> IF HE DOES NOT CUT SERIOUSLY, WON'T HE LOSE THE CONSERVATIVES.

>> LET ME ANSWER THAT.

IT IS NOT A ZERO SUM GAME.

YOU EXPAND THE PIE WHY SO MUCH CONCENTRATION ON BRINGING JOBS BACK AND TRYING TO GROW THE GDP WHICH HAS BEEN MISERABLE AND 1.9%.

WORST RECOVERY EVER EVEN COMING OUT OF THE DEPRESSION WE DID BETTER.

SO THE POINT IS IF YOU UP THAT GROWTH RATE ALL OF THE PROGRAMS ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO STAY MORE INTACT BECAUSE YOU WILL HAVE MORE TAX REVENUE.

YOU WILL NOT HAVE MORE UNLESS WE GROW THE ECONOMY.

>> WE ARE NOT GOING TO HAVE MORE TAX REVENUE BECAUSE HE IS COMMITTED TO CUTTING TAXES WHICH I'M NOT AGAINST BUT LET'S NOT PRETEND WE ARE GOING TO HAVE A BIGGER FEDERAL BUDGET.

>> GROWING GDP.

>> YOU ARE SUGGESTING WE WILL HAVE A BIGGER BUDGET WITH THE INCREASE IN THE GDP.

THE TAX CUTS WILL TAKE CARE OF THAT.

>> I'M CURIOUS NOBODY KNOWS WHAT TRUMP IS GOING TO DO BUT ANNE DOES.

>> I KNOW MORE ABOUT WHAT HE IS GOING TO DO BECAUSE I HAVE A CONVERSATION WITH HIM ALL THE TIME.

>> HE SIGNED THREE CONTINUING RESOLUTIONS SO FAR MEANING PUTTING IT AND HOW LONG DO THEY EXTEND TO?

>> I THINK -- MARCH 31.

>> WHAT IS IN THOSE BUDGETS?

>> I DON'T HAVE THE SPECIFICS BUT I CAN GET THAT FOR ANYBODY WHO IS INTERESTED BUT THERE IS A LOT OF THAT HOMEWORK GOING ON THAT IS GETTING NO ATTENTION IN THE MEDIA.

THEY ARE DOING THEIR JOB.

>> WELL, THE PRESIDENT HAS TO SUBMIT A BUDGET TO CONGRESS IN TWO WEEKS AND WE'LL SEE WHAT THE NUMBERS ARE.

>> OK. AND YOU HAVE -- >> LOOK, I THINK HE IS DOING THE HOMEWORK.

CUTS ACROSS THE BOARD ARE COMING.

WHO IS GOING TO SUFFER IT IS A MATTER OF TIME BUT THE GOAL HERE FOR Mr. TRUMP IS TO TOSS A LOT BACK TO THE STATES.

THIS IS IT.

AND HE FEELS THE STATES HAVE TAKEN TOO MUCH SO THE HOMEWORK WILL TELL US IT'S TOO EARLY.

TOO EARLY.

>> LET US KNOW WHAT YOU THINK.

FROM THE SAFETY NET TO THE SOFTER SIDE OF PRESIDENT TRUMP.

>> CRITICS ARE ALLEGING THAT IVANKA TRUMP'S ROLE IS MORE PR THAN POLICY.

THE PRESIDENT'S DAUGHTER VISITED THE NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN HISTORY AND CULTURE ALONGSIDE DONALD TRUMP AT THE MUSEUM PRESIDENT TRUMP CONDEMNED A RECENT SPATE OF ANTI-SEMITIC ATTACKS AFTER BEING CRITICIZED BY MANY INCLUDING HILLARY CLINTON FOR NOT RESPONDING MORE QUICKLY AND VEHEMENTLY.

IVANKA CONVERTED TO JUDAISM AFTER MARRYING JARED KUSHNER AND SHE TWEETED QUOTE AMERICA IS A NATION BUILT ON THE PRINCIPLE OF RELIGIOUS TOLERANCE.

IVANKA HAS BEEN PRESENT AT MEETINGS BUT SHE HOLDS NO OFFICIAL ROLE THIS HAS CRITICS ASKING IF IVANKA'S MAIN FUNCTION IS TO SOFTEN THE PRESIDENT'S IMAGE.

>> IS IT, ANNE?

>> SHE IS ABOUT REAL POLICY BUT CERTAINLY THERE IS A PR ASPECT TO IT BECAUSE WE KNOW SHE IS PROBABLY ONE OF THE MORE POPULAR TRUMPS IN THE CROWD.

HAVING HER THERE HELPS FROM A PUBLIC RELATIONS STANDPOINT BUT SHE IS ABOUT REAL POLICY AS WELL.

AND THERE ARE A LOT OF CONSERVATIVES NERVOUS ABOUT THE FACT THAT SHE WILL HAVE A POLICY ROLE BECAUSE THEY DO NOT LIKE SOME OF HER POLICIES.

>> LIBERALS DO NOT LIKE, EITHER.

THE FAMILY LEAVE PROPOSAL THAT SHE PUT -- [INAUDIBLE] AND LIBERALS SAID THIS IS NOTHING.

>> WELL, IT'S A STARTING POINT AND BETTER THAN ANYTHING THAT REPUBLICANS PUT FORWARD BEFORE.

BUT IT'S INTERESTING THERE IS A TENSION BETWEEN CONSERVATIVES AND THE IVANKA FANS AS TO WHO IS GOING TO WIN OUT WE'LL SEE.

>> I DON'T SEE IVANKA TRUMP AS A POLITICAL FIGURE.

I DON'T OBJECT TO HER PARTICIPATING.

I THINK YOU KNOW, I WOULD HAVE FELT THE SAME WAY IF CHELSEA CLINTON WERE HANGING AROUND HER MOM TRYING TO GIVE ADVICE ON POLICY.

I DO THINK THAT IT'S UNCLEAR SORT OF WHERE SHE IS STEPPING IN AND WHERE SHE IS NOT.

SHE AND HER HUSBAND WANTED TO TAKE A LOT OF CREDIT FROM PREVENTING THE LGBT EXECUTIVE ORDER FOR INSTANCE THEN WHEN THE TRANSISSUE CAME OUT THEY WERE NOWHERE TO BE FOUND.

>> EXPLAIN THAT TO THE AUDIENCE.

>> WELL, THE YOU KNOW, IVANKA AND JARED'S ACTUAL PUBLIC RELATIONS EFFORT WENT FULL STOP TO TAKE CREDIT FOR THE FACT THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT REPEAL PRESIDENT OBAMA'S EXECUTIVE ORDER ON LGBT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES PROTECTING THEM IN EMPLOYMENT.

AND BUT YET WHEN THIS SECOND ISSUE CAME OUT THE T ISSUE OF THIS PAST WEEK SHE WASN'T AROUND.

SO I DO THINK THAT THERE IS A LITTLE UNCERTAINTY WHAT DOES SHE CARE ABOUT.

I HAVE HEARD THAT SHE IS ON THE HILL TALKING TO DEMOCRATIC WOMEN ON SOME OF THE CHILDCARE ISSUES AND YOU KNOW, IF LOOK THEY CAN COME UP WITH SOMETHING THAT WORKS I'M ALL FOR IT.

THE MORE THE MERRIER.

I AGREE WITH ANNE THAT REPUBLICANS WERE NOT ABOUT TO DO THIS AND IF SHE CAN GET THEM TO DO IT IT'S FINE WITH HE MOO.

>> I HAVE HEARD IT SAID THAT JARED AND IVANKA NOT NOW BECAUSE THEY ARE LIVING IN WASHINGTON D.C.

BUT WHEN THEY WERE LIVING IN NEW YORK THEIR FRIENDS IN NEW YORK CITY ARE ALL LIBERAL AS ARE MOST PEOPLE IN NEW YORK CITY WHERE I GREW UP.

AND THAT THEY WERE GETTING PRESSURE FROM THEIR FRIENDS TO STOP SOME OF THE STUFF THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS TRYING TO DO.

DO YOU SEE HER AS EFFECTIVE IN THAT ROLE?

>> I THINK SHE WILL BE MORE EFFECTIVE IN THE WEEKS TO COME.

RIGHT NOW THIS IS A TRANSITION IT'S SO NEW IN THE ADMINISTRATION.

IVANKA IS AN ENIGMA WRAPPED IN A MYSTERY SHE WAS A WOMAN TRULY A FORCE FOR HER FATHER'S CAMPAIGN.

SHE WAS SOMETHING THAT WOMEN ON BOTH SIDES COULD ADMIRE AND SAY THIS WOMAN IS SETTING THE TONE FOR THE MODERN AMERICAN WOMAN IS SUCCESSFUL IN HER OWN ENDEAVORS AND SUDDENLY WE SEE AND IT'S BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT IN THE ROOM THAT IS WHAT WE HAVE SEEN.

IT DEPENDS WHO IS IN THE ROOM AND WHEN AND THEY ARE ORTHODOX JEWS SO THEY ARE OBSERVANT AND THERE IS A LOT THAT HAPPENS ON THE WEEKENDS IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

I DON'T KNOW THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO BE INFLUENTIAL BECAUSE OF LOGISTICS.

>> IT'S LIKE WHEN PEOPLE ACCUSE YOU OF BEING RACIST, I'M NOT RACIST BECAUSE LOOK AT MY BLACK FRIEND.

SHE DOES NOT HAVE AN OFFICIAL ROLE IN THE WHITE HOUSE.

SECOND OF ALL, I THINK IT'S PLASTIC FEMINISM 101.

"THE NEW YORK TIMES" ARTICULATED THIS WELL THEY ARE A PERFECT COVER FOR TRUMP'S MISOGYNY BECAUSE THEY ARE ATTRACTIVE AND THEY ARE QUIET, THEY DON'T MAKE ANY DEMANDS AND AT THE END OF THE DAY LOOK AT TRUMP'S POLICIES TOWARDS WOMEN AND HIS HISTORY TOWARDS WOMEN.

JOE SAID HE IS THE MODERN INCARNATION OF MALE SHOW VINNISM AND THAT IS THE MAN THEY ARE PRO TYPICALLY TRUMP.

SPARE ME.

SPARE ME.

>> IN A VERY DIFFERENT PICTURE FROM THIS.

>> I REMEMBER ONE OF THE EMPLOYEES TELLING NEW YORK MAGAZINE THAT HE PAID THE WINDSHIELD-WIPER LESS BECAUSE THE MEN HAD LAW DEGREES.

>> THAT IS ONE PERSON AND SHE SAID ABOUT BOTH BAD AND GOOD ABOUT IT.

>> WHERE WAS SHE ABOUT THE MUSLIM BAN.

>> SHE PICKS AND CHOOSES ISSUES.

SHE IS A TOOL.

>> DID ANYBODY SEE THE VIDEO OF TRUMP HOLDING THE TWO ADORABLE GRANDCHILDREN DECKED OUT LIKE NO KIDS THAT YOU KNOW IN REAL OFFENSE.

LIFE.

WALKING THEM TO THE HELICOPTER AND HE IS LIKE THIS.

>> HE IS PROUD OF HIS GRANDCHILDREN.

>> IT ALMOST SEEMED LIKE HE HAD NEVER DONE IT BEFORE.

>> COME ON.

>> AT THE END OF THE DAY HE IS A REALITY TV STAR THE PHOTOS THAT COME ALONG WITH THE TRUMP BRAND.

>> DO YOU FIND IT INTERESTING THEY THEY PUT THE WORST POSSIBLE SPIN IF YOU HAVE HATE BLINDERS ON ABOUT HIM EVERYTHING HE DOES -- >> ONE AT A TIME.

>> LAST WORD.

>> THE ISSUE WITH THE PRESIDENT WHICH IS THAT BECAUSE HE SPOKE ON SO MANY ISSUES OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF HIS MOUTH DURING THE CAMPAIGN HIS CAMPAIGN TEAM WAS AS HEART CONSTANTLY, I THINK THE PROBLEM IS THAT PEOPLE KEEP IMPOSES ON HIM BASED ON THE PEOPLE AROUND HIM WHAT HE FEELS.

SO DOES HE FEEL LIKE STEVE BANNON OR FEELS LIKE IVANKA?

WILL JARED BE MODERATING OR NOT?

PRESIDENT TRUMP IS JUST NOT PARTICULARLY IDEOLOGICAL DOES NOT HAVE A PARTICULAR CORE AND THESE THINGS WILL CONTINUE TO PLAY OUT AS HE DEVELOPS A GOVERNING STYLE AND THEORY HERE.

>> BEHIND THE HEADLINES.

THE ACADEMY AWARD NOMINATED MOVIE HIDDEN FIGURES HAS BECOME A BLOCKBUSTER BUT BEFORE THERE WAS A MOVIE THERE WAS A BOOK DETAILING THE STORY OF FOUR WOMEN WHOSE WIT AND INTELLIGENCE HELPED LEAD AMERICA INTO SPACE.

WE SAT DOWN WITH AUTHOR MARGOT SHETTERLY.

>> I STARTED WORKING ON HIDDEN FIGURES SIX YEARS AGO I'M FROM HAMPTON ROADS MY DAD IS A SCIENTIST AND MY HUSBAND AND I CAME HOME TO VISIT OVER CHRISTMAS AND MY DAD HAPPENED TO BE TALKING ABOUT SOME OF THE WOMEN THAT HE WORKED WITH AT NASA.

MY HUSBAND WAS INTRIGUED AND COULD NOT BELIEVE THAT THIS WAS A STORY THAT HE HAD NEVER HEARD OF SO I SAID TO MYSELF, WELL, I KNEW THESE WOMEN BUT I DID NOT KNOW THE STORY.

AND THAT WAS THE BEGINNING OF WHAT BECAME HIDDEN FIGURES.

>> MANY WOMEN WORKED THE COMPUTERS FOR NASA SOLVING COMPLEX EQUATIONS AND CREATING THE ALGORITHMS THAT PROPELLED THE U.S.

INTO SPACE.

MARGOT SHETTERLY'S STORY FOCUSES ON FOUR OF NASA'S BLACK WINDSHIELD-WIPER, KATHERINE JOHNSON, MARY JACKSON AND CHRISTINE DARDEN.

>> MRS. JOHNSON IS KNOWN FOR HER WORK CALCULATING AND DOING THE MATH AND THE TRAJECTORY FOR JOHN GLEN'S FLIGHT.

DOROTHY VAUGHAN WAS THE FIRST BLACK SUPERVISOR OF THE SEGREGATED WEST AREA COMPUTING UNIT.

MARY JACKSON WAS THE FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN FEMALE ENGINEER AT NASA.

AND CHRISTINE DARDEN STOOD ON THE SHOULDERS OF ALL THREE OF THOSE WOMEN AND SHE BECAME SOMEONE WHO IS STILL RENOWNED FOR HER WORK ON SONIC BOOM PHENOMENON AND SHE BECAME PROMOTED INTO THE SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE FOR NASA.

>> MARGOT SHETTERLY SAYS WE CAN DRAW INSPIRATION FROM THE WOMEN DEPICTEDDEPICTED IN HIDDEN FIGURES.

>> IT IS A STORY THAT TELLS THE DIFFICULT PARTS OF OUR COUNTRY.

AND ALSO SOME OF THE MORE OPTIMISTIC PARTS OF OUR COUNTRY.

AND I REALLY HOPE THAT PEOPLE TAKE NOT JUST ENTHUSIASM BUT YOU KNOW TAKE SOMETHING FROM THE TENACITY OF THESE WOMEN WHO GOT UP TO WORK EVERYDAY UNDER CIRCUMSTANCES THAT REQUIRED THEM TO GO TO THE COLORED BATHROOM OR THE COLORED CAFETERIA AND YET THEY DID THEIR BEST.

AND THIS IS AN EXCELLENT STORY FOR THE TIMES THAT WE ARE IN RIGHT NOW.

>> A RECENT STUDY FOUND YOUNG GIRLS THINK OF THEMSELVES AS LESS SMART THAN BOYS.

MARGOT SHETTERLY BELIEVES THE LIVES AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE WOMEN DEPICTED IN HIDDEN FIGURES SHOW YOUNG GIRLS JUST THE OPPOSITE.

>> THAT IS ONE OF THE REASONS THAT PEOPLE HAVE SHOWN ENTHUSIASM FOR THE STORY.

HERE WE ARE DISCOVERING THAT HUNDREDS OF WOMEN PERHAPS MORE THAN A THOUSAND WOMEN WERE WORKING AT NASA RIGHT, ONE OF THE WORLD'S MOST INFLUENTIAL SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING ORGANIZATIONS, THEY WERE ON THE JOB FOR THE BETTER PART OF THE 20TH EXCEPT INDUSTRY AND WE ARE ONLY NOW WAKING UP TO THE FACT THAT THEY WERE THERE.

THE THING ABOUT THE STORY IT PROVES STATISTICALLY WITH EVIDENCE THAT WOMEN ARE GOOD AT MATH GIVEN A CHANCE YOU KNOW THAT PEOPLE OF COLOR THAT WOMEN OF COLOR CAN COME INTO THE SCIENTIFIC POSITIONS AND DO EXTRAORDINARY WORK.

>> MARGOT SHETTERLY HOPES NEW INFORMATION AND SHIFTING PERSPECTIVES WILL BRING MORE WOMEN THE RECOGNITION THEY DESERVE.

>> AS WE UNDERSTAND MORE ABOUT WHAT THEY DID AND YOU KNOW WE KIND OF LOOK AT THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS WITH A DIFFERENT FRAME, I THINK IT WILL BE MORE LIKELY THAT NOT ONLY THESE WOMEN BUT MANY WOMEN LIKE THEM WILL START GETTING THE CREDIT FOR THE WORK THAT THEY DID OVER THE DECADES.

>> AS FOR THE SUCCESS OF THE MOVIE VERSION OF HER BOOK... >> I THINK THERE IS A LOT OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE WHO WERE EAGER TO SEE THEMSELVES WHETHER IT'S AFRICAN-AMERICANS OR WOMEN OR SCIENTISTS YOU KNOW, THIS IS A MOVIE THAT I THINK MAKES MATHMITICIANS AND SCIENTISTS COOL.

>> IT DOES IF YOU HAVE SEEN THE MOVIE.

HOW MUCH IMPACT DO YOU THINK THIS WILL HAVE ON LITTLE GIRLS LITTLE AFRICAN-AMERICAN GIRLS?

>> I THINK IT WILL HAVE A TREMENDOUS IMPACT.

I'M NOT A HUGE FAN OF CINEMA BUT THE TALK AROUND THE MOVIE IS HUGE.

IT'S GOING TO HELP YOUNGER GIRLS THAT THERE ARE WOMEN OF COLOR THAT CAN RISE TO PROMINENCE AND IT MAY TAKE TIME BUT I WAS A LITTLE GIRL WHO DID NOT GROW UP THINKING.

>> YOU WENT TO ENGINEERING SCHOOL.

>> I WAS GIVEN A CHANCE TO SHOW I WAS GOOD AT MATH.

WHEN YOU SEE IT IN EVERYDAY PUBLIC LIFE LOOK THERE ARE WOMEN THAT ARE STRONG AND DID SOMETHING THAT WOMEN ARE NOT THOUGHT TO ALWAYS GOING TO DO IT IS GOING TO HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE MINDS OF THE YOUNGER WOMEN.

>> ANYTHING THAT TELLS WOMEN AND GIRLS AND ENCOURAGING THEM TO BE IN STEM IS FANTASTIC.

AND THIS IS NOT JUST ABOUT WOMEN BREAKING BARRIERS IT'S ABOUT SEXISM AND RACISM THEY COULD NOT USE THE SAME BATHROOMS AS WHITE PEOPLE WHEN THE WOMEN WERE WORKING AT NASA.

>> THEY SHOWED THE WOMAN DRESSED RUNNING IN THE RAIN IN HIGH HEELS, HALF A MILE TO THE COLORED BATHROOM.

IT MADE YOU HATE -- >> I UNDERSTAND THAT PART WAS NOT TRUE AS THE MEN ALSO WERE COMPOSITE CHARACTERS BUT OVERALL THE STORY IS FABULOUS.

I'VE SEEN THE MOVIE MULTIPLE TIMES AND IT SHOULD BE SHOWN IN EVERY SECONDARY SCHOOL IN THE COUNTRY MULTIPLE TIMES AND SHOULD GET THE OSCAR.

IT'S NOT GOING TO WHICH IS JUST A DISGRACE.

>> I'M WONDERING HOW LONG IT WAS BETWEEN THE TIME SHE WROTE THAT BOOK AND WHEN IT WAS OPTIONED FOR HOLLYWOOD.

BECAUSE IF IT WASN'T LIKE OPTIONED WHILE SHE WAS EVEN WRITING IT IT WAS WAY TOO LATE AS FAR AS I'M CONCERNED.

>> I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT.

BUT GIVEN THAT THE OSCARS ARE ON TONIGHT, I DO THINK YOU KNOW I WORKED IN THE ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS FOR 17 YEARS AND I THINK THERE ARE MOMENTS THAT WHERE STORYTELLING CAPTURES SOMETHING THAT FEELS REAL IN SOCIETY IN A WAY AND TELLS THE STORY IN A WAY THAT BRINGS MAKES POLICY YOU KNOW, SEEM VERY CONNECTED TO PEOPLE.

AND I THINK THIS IS ONE OF THOSE MOVIES AND I THINK I HOPE IT DOES WELL.

>> AND YOU KNOW ONE OF MY PET PEEVES IS I NEVER HAD A FEMALE ROLE MODEL.

AND THESE WOMEN NEVER HAD BLACK OR FEMALE ROLE MODELS AND YET, THEY WERE ABLE TO GET TO THE VERY TOP OF THEIR PROFESSIONS.

SO DOES THE SHOW YOU YOU DON'T NEED A ROLE MODEL WHO LOOKS LIKE YOU?

>> THEY HAD PEOPLE THAT APPRECIATED THEM AND SUPPORTED THEM IN THE CLASSROOM AND I THINK WE CAN NEVER GIVE TEACHERS ENOUGH CREDIT IN MY VIEW GOING FORWARD.

BUT THE ROLE THAT TEACHERS ARE PLAYING AND THE ROLE THAT TEACHERS NEED TO PLAY IN A WORLD THAT IS CHANGING SO MUCH TRADITIONAL EDUCATION IS NOT PREPARING KIDS TODAY FOR THE JOBS OF TOMORROW.

AND NOTHING IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THOSE STEM PROGRAMS THIS MOVIE COMES AT A GOOD TIME.

>> AND I ALWAYS SAY WE SHOULD BE PAYING TEACHERS WHO FOOTBALL PLAYERS MAKE AND THE OTHER WAY AROUND FOR THE FOOTBALL PLAYERS.

FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER AND VISIT OUR WEBSITE.

PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.

AND WHETHER YOU AGREE OR THINK TO THE CONTRARY, SEE YOU NEXT WEEK.

FOR A TRANSCRIPT OF THIS EPISODE OF TO THE CONTRARY VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT PBS.ORG/TOTHECONTRARY.

[♪♪]